www.gaap-ifrs.com
Theory and practice of financial and management accountiong
LibraryNewsShopServicesDiscussionsJobÎáó÷åíèå
 

Subscribe to newsline
E-mail:
[ adjust data / unsubscribe ]
Search for news
Filter by sources
Filter by data
Choose starting data :
Choose end data :
Latest comments
  • FASB suspends income tax project 
    opinions: 1    ïîñëåäíåå :
    I would like to pose a question being that my major is in accounting. I sit rying to figure out the question is that FASB and the IFRS going to merge or go to one or the other and how can I prepare for this change as far as school is concern. Do I h Kenneth Bledsoe
  • Fair value standard will be released next month: Tweedie 
    opinions: 1    ïîñëåäíåå :
    IFRS foundation and IASB should try to find a solution on new Fair value standard. They should not accept any interference from the AICPA / FASB / US-SEC to dilute the standard. US has made a case that last US-Financial meltdown was to a large ex Al Khan, CA
  • Global anti-bonus campaign 
    opinions: 1    ïîñëåäíåå :
    First, Executive Compensation and re-election of Directors must be totally re-examined afresh to come up with legislation to control corporate greed and accounting sheningans by corporations. Second, a cap on tax deductibility of executive compensa Al Khan
  • A new Web site is providing sample questions for the CPA Exam for free 
    opinions: 2    ïîñëåäíåå :
    2 Mohit. Not too much, but still better than nothing: http://www.gaap-ifrs.com/special/tests/ifrs.asp Alexander Kurnikov

We not convinced by FASB’s Fair Value reforms: ICAEW

“We do have some immediate concerns” - ICAEW

[28.05.2010 - 15:22] © AccountancyAge, Mario Christodoulou
Details
PrintTell a FriendAdd to Favorites

The UK’s largest accounting institute said it is not convinced both the US and international fair value proposals are compatible.

The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) this week released its package of accounting reforms for financial instruments, which is at odds with international rules. FASB’s proposals may force companies to carry more items at fair value, unlike the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) model, used by most countries across the world, which uses a mixed-measurement model, with some assets carried at amortized cost.

The ICAEW said it is not convinced FASB’s model. Fair value refers to the accounting principle where items are valued and reported at their market price. It was criticized for increasing volatility in markets during the crisis as banks’ asset values plummeted in illiquid markets. Nigel Sleigh-Johnson, head of the ICAEW financial reporting faculty at the ICAEW, said it would take some time to understand all the “complex implications” of the proposals.

“We do have some immediate concerns on the FASB classification and measurement proposals, which introduce more fair value measurement into the balance sheet and increase the use of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) in an attempt to provide both fair value and amortized cost information for financial instruments held for the receipt or payment of contractual cash flows”, - he said. - “Given the differences in classification and measurement between the FASB and IASB approaches and potential difficulties in maintaining both detailed fair value and amortized cost data, we are also not convinced that it will be straightforward to reconcile the differences between the two approaches, which seem more conceptual than presentational”.

FASB and the IASB have until June 2011 to converge their two accounting codes. The IASB is encouraging its constituents to respond to FASB’s proposal.

Tell us what you think

Attention! The fields marked by an asterisk (*) are obligatory for filling

Your name*:
Your E-mail:
Your opinion:*

 

Copyright © 1999—2009 gaap-ifrs.com

Editorial is not responsible for the reliability of published promotional information.


Contact us

Authors

Terms of publication

Advertisement


Design by  [4rome]